MACo Calls for Broader Engagement in Creating Health and Safety Standards

MACo Executive Director Michael Sanderson yesterday submitted testimony to the House Economic Matters Committee in opposition to HB 124 Occupational Safety and Health Standards to Protect Employees – Aerosol Transmissible Diseases and COVID-19. This bill implements new regulations and standards to protect employees from airborne diseases.

From the MACo Testimony:

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed employers, including local governments, under great stressto continue to serve, deliver, or produce while facing safety threats. A path forward for
workplace oversight to guide the propriety of such measures is a sensible follow-through.
HB 124, however, is deeply prescriptive, and pre-supposes a lengthy list of measures that must appear in such emergency regulations.

County governments are affected, not only in their capacity as employers, but also in HB 124 in some cases as the entities charged with fielding complaints about these workplace concerns. Local health departments and their environmental health specialists simply do not have the capacity nor personnel to step into a new role to field and engage in the sort of workplace interventions envisioned under this bill. The State Department of Labor, using a stakeholderdriven process, is the better and time-tested means to bring about any new oversight and enforcement in this area.

Under HB 124, and its multiple specific requirements, counties would be obliged to engage in a deep classification of their thousands of employees, with evaluation toward the risks not only for COVID-19 but untold other possible jobsite concerns. Again, the detailed nature of the requirements in HB 124 make the bill so all-encompassing as to likely put even the most diligent county governments out of compliance in some manner.

Follow MACo’s Advocacy Efforts during the 2021 legislative session on MACo’s Legislative Tracking Database.

Close Menu
%d bloggers like this: