MACo: Collective Bargaining Would Hamstring Maryland Environmental Service

On February 23, 2016, MACo Research Director Robin Clark Eilenberg testified in opposition of HB 795, Maryland Environmental Service – Collective Bargaining, to the House Appropriations Committee.

HB 795 would require the Maryland Environmental Service (MES) to recognize and deal with an employee organization that is elected as an exclusive representative of MES employees and collectively bargain.

From the MACo testimony,

As noted on the MES website (, MES is a self-supporting fee-for-service agency that “provides services at competitive rates to government and private sector clients and works on projects including water and wastewater treatment, solid waste management, composting, recycling, dredged material management, hazardous materials cleanup, storm water services and renewable energy.” Maryland counties are major MES clients and in FY 2015, MES did $38.4 million in business with various counties. This represented 27% of MES’ total income for that year.

As the bill’s fiscal note indicates, MES estimates it will likely have to charge an additional $1.3 to $3.4 million annually to local governments as a result of mandatory collective bargaining. This would undermine the unique role MES plays in assisting local governments to meet numerous federal and State environmental mandates.

HB 795 would apply mandatory collective bargaining rights to an independent State agency that provides many critical and low-cost services to county and municipal governments. The bill would increase local costs and potentially jeopardize the role of MES in providing these services.

MACo previously testified in opposition to an identical bill, SB 447, before the Senate Finance Committee on February 18.

For more on 2016 MACo legislation, visit the Legislative Database.

Close Menu
%d bloggers like this: