MACo Raises Safety, Liability Concerns Over Cannabis Protections for Fire and Rescue Workers

On February 19, Associate Policy Director Sarah Sample testified before the Finance Committee in opposition to SB 439 – Employment Discrimination – Fire and Rescue Public Safety Employees – Use of Medical Cannabis. 

This bill prohibits an employer from disciplining or discharging a fire and rescue public safety employee for the use of cannabis if the employee possesses a written certification.

While counties recognize evolving state law regarding cannabis and support clear workplace standards, SB 439 raises significant liability, operational, and public safety concerns for local governments responsible for employing and overseeing fire and rescue personnel.

From MACo Testimony: 

In practice, there is no scientifically reliable, universally accepted test to determine real-time cannabis impairment. This leaves employers in an untenable position, attempting to determine when use occurred and whether an employee was actually impaired while performing critical public safety duties. For fire and rescue personnel, who operate emergency vehicles, respond to life-threatening situations, and make split-second decisions affecting public safety, any ambiguity surrounding impairment standards poses a substantial risk.

SB 439’s cross-file, HB 797, was heard on March 11 in the Economic Matters Committee. Associate Policy Director Karrington Anderson testified in opposition to this bill.

More on MACo’s Advocacy: