Local Road Money Gets “A Little Boost” In State Budget

March 31, 2011

Coverage today by Capital News Service discusses the one-time funding being provided for county and municipal governments in the developing state budget for FY 2012, noting “Maryland counties and municipalities are set to receive a one-time $13.2 million infusion to help maintain and repair battered roads, under spending plans recently approved by the House and Senate.”

From coverage in the Herald-Mail:

The state’s portion of the funds it gives to local governments has dropped from about $555 million to an estimated $137 million between fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2012, according to legislative analysts.

Under the recently-approved one-time grant, Maryland’s 157 municipalities are set to receive an extra $8.2 million for road projects on top of the $1.6 million they were originally allocated.

The state’s 23 counties will split an additional $5 million on top of the $8.2 million originally allocated under the state’s formula for highway user revenue.

“This is important for municipalities that have really been shortchanged the past several years and are in desperate need of those funds,” said Sen. James DeGrange, an Anne Arundel Democrat and a key Senate budget writer. “The counties also need a little boost and this will help.”

Lawmakers have chipped away at the amount given to local governments for roads since 2008, but in fiscal 2010, the state Board of Public Works slashed highway user revenue funding for most local jurisdictions by roughly 95 percent, according to the Maryland Association of Counties.

The General Assembly made the reductions permanent in 2010 and also tweaked the funding distribution formula to reduce local governments’ share of highway user revenue from 30 percent to about 9 percent.

With both chambers’ passed budgets agreeing on this funding amount, these distributions appear to be resolved and not likely to be debated further in the final days of the budget process. A conference committee is convening today to start working out the final proposed budget, a process that traditionally focuses nearly exclusively on “issues of difference” where the two chambers have disagreed.


County Issues Watch – Week of March 28 – April 1

March 29, 2011

The General Assembly has passed its “crossover” date, meaning most legislation destined to pass has been approved by its house of origin. As always, exceptions apply – and there remains much work to be done in Annapolis in these final days until the April 11 end of session. Here we will detail issues of interest to the county community that are likely to play out during the week of March 28-April 1, 2011.

Budget Conference

The Senate will debate its budget plan on the floor this week, and then House and Senate budget leaders will begin their conference — meetings between the two chambers to produce a consensus budget plan to bring to both chambers for a final “up or down” vote. Most of the major county fiscal issues have seemingly been narrowed by agreement between the two chambers – rejecting a massive shift of teacher pensions, rejecting a dismantling of Program Open Space and other transfer tax funded programs, but agreeing to a substantial cost shift for administration of the pension system. Continued debate will likely address reforms to pension and health care benefits for employees, and different approaches to revenues from the two houses.

On the list for county governments, the largest dollar amount remaining unresolved is the proposed shift of assessment costs, beginning in FY 2012. The Governor proposed shifting 90% of these costs (about $35 million), the House reduced this shift to 50% (roughly $20 million), but the Senate accepted the Governor’s full shift proposal. The amount of this shift will have an immediate impact on county budgets still in development.

Maintenance of Effort – Waiver Deadline May Focus Discussion

SB 53 and HB 44, the two bills MACo has supported to reform the waiver process for Maintenance of Effort, remain apparently stalled in their committees. Both bills had public hearings weeks ago (February 2 in the Senate, February 9 in the House), but neither has been taken up for attention in a subcommittee, nor brought up for a final committee vote. With the bills introduced as “Emergency Bills” (meaning they would take effect immediately upon being signed into law), MACo had hoped for prompt action to reform the waiver process for FY 2012 budgets. However, with no new legislation in effect, the State Board of Education’s April 1 deadline for waiver requests remains, and the standards and timing under current law will apparently remain in effect for this year’s requests.

MACo remains hopeful for action on these important bills. If multiple counties seek waivers for the Fy 2012 budget year, perhaps the legislative committees will recognize the breadth of the issues raised by this challenging funding level in an environment of declining revenues.

Should State Law Extend Local Permits?

HB 1050, legislation to provide an extended “tolling period” for local permits has passed the House, and is heard this week in the Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee. MACo has opposed the bill, raising concerns that its overbroad application simply mandates one-size-fits-all rules to a wide spectrum of local permits — many of which apply to land use decisions that may have been appropriate at their origination in 2008, 2009, or 2010, but do not necessarily merit a multi-year extension granted by the bill. A similar bill failed in this Senate committee last year, but MACo will continue efforts to articulate the importance of local autonomy in managing these local approvals.

Unemployment Insurance – Potential for Relief?

The Administration’s bill ( HB 1228/SB 882) to accept federally-paid extended unemployment insurance benefits for private sector workers has raised concerns with the effect on public sector employers, who are self-insured and must pay for these benefits directly. MACo and MML have jointly worked to seek administrative relief from these costs, and are pursuing amendment language to effect some offset to these potential costs. Both bills are still awaiting action, presumably pending the outcome of these negotiations.

Keep reading the Conduit Street blog for developing news on county issues as the session progresses.


House and Senate Budget Actions – What’s Left?

March 26, 2011

As reported previously, the full House has approved its budget plan and the full Senate will debate its plan this week.  Whereas, the Senate concurred with a large number of actions taken by the House, a few issues of importance to local governments remain to be resolved.  These include the assessment  function shift, language to shift costs for the implementation of a video conference system to perform local inmate parole hearings, the Disparity Grant, and a few education items.  MACo has summarized the decisions summarized the decisions taken by the House and the Senate budget committee and the items that remain to be resolved through a conference committee.  It is anticipated that conference discussions to develop a final fiscal plan for both the operating budget (HB 70) and Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act (HB 72) will begin by April 1.


Senate Budget Committee Approves Budget Plan: Rejects Pension Shift, Agrees To One-Time Funding for Local Roads

March 25, 2011

The Senate Budget and Taxation Committee approved its plan to modify the Governor’s 2012 proposed budget, concurring with a large number of the actions taken by the House.  As a part of their plan, the Senate Committee concurred with the House to restore funding for education, rejected a Department of Legislative Services (DLS) recommendation to transfer 50 percent of teacher retirement expenses to the local boards of education, and concurred with a one-time payment of $13.2 million to counties and municipalities, $5 million and $8.2 million respectively, for local roadways. The Senate Committee also concurred with the House to rejected a DLS recommendation to direct all transfer tax revenue, which funds Program Open Space (POS) and other land preservation programs, to the General Fund and establish a statutory minimum funding level for all programs of $50 million.

For county governments, one major difference in the House and Senate plan is the shifting of costs for property assessments.  The House reduced the shift to 50 percent of the costs, whereas the Senate committee adopted the full 90 percent shift as proposed in the Governor’s budget.  The Senate proposal would cost county governments roughly $35 million annually, while the House’s lesser version would cost counties only about $20 million a year. Like the substantial range of issues where the House and Senate have different approaches, this item will be sent to a conference committee to develop a final fiscal plan for both the operating budget (HB 70) and Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act (HB 72). The Senate is likely to debate the budget plan on the floor next week, and the conference committee will begin work soon thereafter.

The Budget and Taxation Committee also included revenue from an increase in the alcohol tax.  After approving its budget plan, the Committee voted on a 3 percent increase on alcohol sales that would be phased-in over three years.  Revenue generated in FY 2012 would be used to fund developmental disabilities, a restoration of the disparity grant, and targeted education funding.

Other differences are in the areas of retiree health benefits and pensions, as well as a wide range of modest differences in state agency funding levels or restrictions.

Information outlining the difference in the House and Senate plans, as well issues remaining to be resolved, will be made available on the MACo blog in the coming days.  Press coverage of budget discussions can found at the links below.

MarylandReporter.com
The Daily Record
Associated Press


National Trend: States Passing Down “Pain” to Local Governments

March 24, 2011

As Maryland debates its own fiscal plan for FY 2012 and beyond — a budget that carries over more than $500 million in annual budget cuts and cost shifts affecting county and municipal governments — other States are facing similar budget challenges, and either debating or actually resorting to similar measures. From coverage in today’s New York Times:

The reductions in state aid, along with falling property tax revenues that are finally catching up with lower home values, are major sources of fiscal stress for many cities. Ben S. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, said in a speech this month that “many localities have been hard hit by reductions in state aid, which in 2008 accounted for about 30 percent of local revenues.” And Moody’s Investors Service, the ratings agency, said in a report last week that many states “are increasingly pushing down their problems to their local governments.” The Moody’s report warned that this would be “the toughest year for local governments since the economic downturn began.”

The cuts are a vivid illustration of a fact of fiscal life: budgetary pain flows downhill. Although state tax collections are finally improving again after the longest and deepest decline on record, they remain well below their prerecession levels. Stimulus money from Washington, which helped keep many states afloat over the last two years, is drying up. So states facing large deficits are proposing cuts in local aid.

The article references a report from Moody’s Investor Services, entitled “2011 Sector Outlook for U.S. Local Governments — Toughest Year Yet.” The full reportis available to Moody’s subscribers.


Major Unions Seek Pension Reform Compromise

March 24, 2011

As the House of Delegates appears prepared to pass its own revised version of pension and benefits reform for state employees and teachers, the two largest unions appear to be lining up behind a compromise proposal to adjust facets of the pension reform proposal.

Coverage in the Baltimore Sun indicates:

The Maryland State Education Association, a 71,000 member union, would go along with O’Malley’s proposed higher contribution rate (5 percent to 7 percent), though the new rate would phase in over two years, according to a presentation MSEA emailed around Annapolis Wednesday.

They also accept O’Malley’s proposal to that new hires would have to work for 30 years before retiring.

The most meaningful difference is over the tricky area of average final compensation — the figure used to determine the size of they pension check: Teachers want it to be calculated as the average pay over their last three years. O’Malley’s plan would extend that time period to five years, diluting the final salary in most cases.

According to the Sun, another major union (AFSCME) is “largely supportive” of the proposal.

The Washington Post notes that the Governor, who proposed the initial round of reforms as part of his budget plan, is contemplating the alternative proposal:

O’Malley spokesman Shaun Adamec said the governor is reviewing the proposal.

The plan would have roughly the same impact in fiscal 2012, Adamec said, but “it takes a little longer in the out years and there is a long-term sustainability problem.”

Early discussion of the alternative proposal indicates that its design would still afford the same savings for FY 2012 ($120 million in general fund relief) that has been incorporated as part of both the Governor’s and the House’s budget plans.


Program Open Space Funding Formula Left Intact

March 23, 2011

The Senate Budget and Taxation’s Capital Budget Subcommittee concurred with the House Appropriations Committee on funding both state and local Program Open Space  (POS) and rejected a Department of Legislative Services recommendation to direct all transfer tax revenue, which funds POS and other land preservation programs, to the General Fund and establish a statutory minimum funding level for all programs of $50 million.  This action would have essentially eliminated Program Open Space. The House and Senate budget committees’ agreement on this issue almost certainly resolves the matter for this year.


Differing Views on House Budget Plan

March 23, 2011

In a segment on WYPR  this morning, Joel McCord reports mixed reaction to the House Appropriations Committee recommendations for the State’s budget plan for FY 2012. Delegate Norman Conway, Chair of the House Appropriations Committee said his committee set out to meet the recommendations of state budget advisors to reduce the structural deficit by 33-and-a-third percent this year and exceeded expectations. They cut it by 40 percent.  He called the recommendations “frugal but fair.”

House Minority Leader Tony O’Donnell stated the recommendations did not go far enough because the panel cut only about six million dollars from the governor’s original plan.

“In the scheme of a $34 billion budget the actions this House took were virtually non-existent.”

The budget will be considered by the full House of Delegates today and Delegate O’Donnell indicated:

His party would offer amendments today, but would not detail them. He pointed to a budget plan House Republicans released earlier this month.


House Budget Plan – Online Summary Document Available

March 22, 2011

The Department of legislative Services has release its summary of the House Appropriations Committee’s budget plan – online as a 31-page document in pdf format.

See previous coverage on the Conduit Street blog for details of provisions with county government effect.

To jump quickly to the segment of the summary document showing fiscal effects for FY 2012, click here.

The House budget plan is expected to be debated on the floor or the House during an afternoon session on Wednesday. Interested parties may follow the proceedings, and listen to the floor debate, at the General Assembly’s website.


County Issues Watch – Week of March 21-25

March 21, 2011

The General Assembly’s session continues in “high gear” with three weeks remaining. Here we will detail issues of interest to the county community that are likely to unfold (or begin unfolding) during the week of March 21-25, 2011.

Budget, Round Two

The Senate now takes up its budget proposals, in a similar manner to the House action last week. Subcommittees of the Budget and Taxation Committee will hold decision meetings on Monday, and the full committee will meet on Thursday to receive the subcommittee recommendations. After doing so, the committee will take up “full committee” items, many of which will involve changes to the Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act.

Most of the major county fiscal issues — continued cuts to local roadway funding, a number of proposed cost shifts, and possible a shift of teacher pension costs – will be front and center as the Committee reveals its fiscal plan for FY 2012 and beyond.

As the Senate is working toward its own proposal, the House Appropriations Committee will be reporting to the floor of the House, with debate on the full range of issues from the Budget Bill itself and the BRFA being discussed by the full body. While major changes are not likely on the floor of the House, the floor often takes an extended period to review and consider amendments and alternatives, making this week a crowded calendar for the House floor.

Maintenance of Effort – Apparently No Hurry on “Emergency Bill”

SB 53 and HB 44, the two bills MACo has supported to reform the waiver process for Maintenance of Effort, remain apparently stalled in their committees. Both bills had public hearings weeks ago (February 2 in the Senate, February 9 in the House), but neither has been taken up for attention in a subcommittee, nor brought up for a final committee vote. With the bills introduced as “Emergency Bills” (meaning they would take effect immediately upon being signed into law), MACo had hoped for prompt action to reform the waiver process for FY 2012 budgets. However, with no new legislation in effect, the State Board of Education’s April 1 deadline for waiver requests remains, and the standards and timing under current law will apparently remain in effect for this year’s requests.

Deadlines Approaching for Bill Passage

The “Committee Reporting Courtesy Date” of March 22 is not a firm rule of either chamber, but it provides a reasonable measure to ensure that most proposals that the House and Senate Committees seek to pass. Legislation that remains “bottled up” in its original committee for long after this date has a reduced chance of completing its advancement through the General Assembly.

Keep reading the Conduit Street blog for developing news on county issues as the session progresses.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers