Senator Reid Reintroduces Public Safety Collective Bargaining Bill

December 8, 2010

On November 30, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reintroduced the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act ( S.3991), which would grant collective bargaining rights to state and local police, fire fighters, and emergency medical technicians and set minimum bargaining standards.  Senator Reid, the bill’s sponsor, filed for cloture on the bill on December 6 but subsequently withdrew the motion.  The National Association of Counties (NACo) has issued an action alert urging counties to contact their Senators and express opposition to the bill.

As previously reported by Conduit Street, a prior version of the bill passed the House of Representatives last summer.


Montgomery County Discusses Possible Salary, Benefit Cuts to All County Employees

December 8, 2010

The Montgomery County Office of Legislative Oversight released a report Tuesday, indicating that County government employees may be subject to pay cuts and decreased employer contributions to health and retirement plans in an effort to alleviate budget constraints.   Compiled at the request of the County Council, the report highlights that employee salaries and benefits are the major cost driver- totaling $2.1 billion for fiscal year 2011.  With more than a $300 million budget deficit for the 2012 fiscal year, the County is now considering including employees of the County Public Schools system in future budget reductions.  The Gazette reports:

The report released Tuesday shows that the county could save $22.9 million in fiscal 2012 by imposing a 1 percent pay cut for all government employees. A 5 percent pay decrease would save the county $114.6 million — $73.4 million of which would come from Montgomery County Public Schools.

For an employee earning $70,000, a 1 percent decrease would reduce the employee’s salary by $700 a year. The same employee would lose $3,500 under a 5 percent reduction.

The report also shows how the county could save money by providing smaller cost-of-living increases or cost-of-living raises every other year.

Other possibilities include charging county government employees 30 percent of the premium for their medical and prescription drug coverage. School system employees pay 5 percent of the premium cost for medical coverage, while county government employees pay 20 percent of the premium. Montgomery College employees pay 25 percent.

…..

Council President Valerie Ervin (D-Dist. 5) of Silver Spring said she is unsure whether the council will work to enact the recommendations during deliberations over the fiscal 2012 budget.

She said she hopes to have options being considered by the council this month based on the report.

While the school system has resisted the council’s previous calls for it to reduce employee compensation, Ervin said her goal is to communicate with the school system about the urgency of the situation.


Benefit Sustainability Commission Meets – Discusses Employee Compensation and Pension Changes in Other States

October 11, 2010

The Public Employees’ and Retirees’ Benefit Sustainability Commission held its first meeting on October 7 before a packed room in the House of Delegates office building.  In his opening comments, chair of the Commission and former House Speaker, Cas Taylor, stated they have an enormous amount of studying to do and an appropriate amount of time to do it.  He did express skepticism however, over whether the Commission will have proposed changes for the 2011 General Assembly Session.

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller sat through some of the meeting and was given the opportunity to make introductory remarks.  President Miller said that pension system costs have increased significantly over the past 5 years.  He stated that the corridor method is a problem and that investments have declined, but he also made reference to the State funded teacher’s pension system when he commented, “Can you imagine someone else determining salaries and you have to pay for it?”  He said that the Senate tried to address this issue, but the efforts to have the counties pick up a portion of the teacher pension costs failed in the House.  He continued by saying, “Maryland is the only state to give income tax up to the counties.”  He further stated that Maryland has a high tax rate because of the piggy back tax.

The bulk of the meeting was spent with the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) providing briefings which compared public and private compensation, and pension benefits of other states.  Interesting findings include:

  • 23 state have set retirement age at 65 or higher – retirement age of Maryland’s employee and teacher pension systems is 62
  • Maryland’s employee and teacher pension systems provide an unreduced retirement allowance at 30 years of service, regardless of age – a majority of other states do not provide this benefit
  • Maryland’s employee and teacher pension systems  trend toward the median with regard to employee contribution rates – 17 states have employee contribution rates over 5%

DLS staff also provided a historical overview of the retirement and pension system.

The last speaker, Ron Snell from the National Conference of State Legislatures, provided information on retirement legislation enacted across the country.  Mr. Snell said, “More states have enacted significant retirement legislation in 2010 than in any other year in memory.”  According to Mr. Snell, trends include the following:

Reduced benefits for new employees with the same service and compensation

Higher employee contributions as a percent of salary

More restrictions on retirement before normal age and on retired people returning to covered service

Most changes occur within the framework of defined contribution plans

Replacement of defined benefit plans with hybrid plans in Michigan and Utah

Mr. Snell provided more specific information on the plans adopted by Michigan and Utah.

Michigan School Employees Retirement System – all teachers statewide
o   Replaces a defined benefit plan for employees hired after July 1, 2010 with a hybrid

  • Defined Benefit with higher age and service requirement and a lower benefit than the former plan. AFC based on 5 year (3 years in closed plan)
  • Plus an opt-out defined contribution (401k) plan, with an employer match (4-year vesting) to employee contributions. Within limits, school districts may negotiate levels of employee contributions and employer match.
  • No post-retirement COLA for the defined benefit portion

Utah Hybrid Plan

  • Provides choice for employees – a defined contribution plan fully funded by employers with a contribution of 10% of salary or a plan that combines features of a defined contribution and a defined benefit plan
    • Defined contribution component, employers will contribute 10% of salary
    • When 10% is insufficient to meet the actuarially required contribution to meet full funding, employees will make up the difference
    • When the 10% is more than is required to keep the plan actuarially sound, the difference will be deposited in an employee 401(k) account
    • Employees may but are not required to contribute to the 401(k)
    • Defined benefit available to 65/4; 60/20; 62/10; any age with 35 years of service. Five-year FAS; defined benefit equals 1.5% FAS for each year of service (presently 3-year FAS 2% factor)

Presentation materials can be found on the DLS website.

As the meeting closed, Chairman Taylor announced that the next meeting would be held on October 19 at 3:00 pm in room 120 of the Lowe House Office Building.  He said they would discuss pension funding and investment policy and begin discussing employee and retiree health care.

More coverage of the Benefit Sustainability Commission’s first meeting can be found on MarylandReporter.com and Gazette.net.


States Seeking to Reduce Pension Liabilities

September 20, 2010

At a time when states are facing large budget shortfalls, many are looking for ways to cut pension costs and use this savings to balance the state budget.  To achieve savings, benefits of employees not yet hired are being reduced, which allows a state to factor in the savings in the current term because it reduces the unfunded liability of the system in the future.  According to the New York Times, this practice has been raising flags in a number of states, including Illinois, Rhode Island, Texas, Ohio, and Arkansas.

Actuaries have been using the method for years, it turns out, but nobody noticed, in part because official documents usually describe it in language few can understand.

The technique is fairly innocuous in normal times, allowing governments to smooth out their labor costs over many years. But it becomes much riskier when pension funds have big shortfalls, when they need several decades to pay down their losses and when they are cutting benefits for future workers — precisely the conditions that exist today.

Cuts for workers not yet hired do not save much money in the present — but that’s where actuaries can work their magic. They capture the future savings for use today by assuming, in essence, that 100 percent of today’s work force is already earning tomorrow’s skimpier benefits. When used in actuarial calculations, that assumption has a powerful effect. It reduces the amount a government must put into its workers’ pension fund every year.

That saves the government money. But it undermines the pension fund, which must still pay the richer benefits of today’s retirees. And because the calculations are esoteric, it is hard for anyone except a seasoned actuary to see what is going on.


Benefit Sustainability Commission to Hold First Meeting in Next Few Weeks

September 14, 2010

After months of waiting, the Public Employees’ and Retirees’ Benefit Sustainability Commission has been appointed and as reported by MarylandReporter, is moving forward to put together a schedule and hold its first meeting, which could be the end of this month or the beginning of October.  The Commission is to study and make recommendations with respect to all aspects of State funded benefits and pensions provided to State and public education employees and retirees in the State.  One issue in particular is the unfunded liability associated with retiree pensions and health benefits.

“What is the reasonable level of unfunding? That is the important question,” said commission chairman Casper Taylor, Jr., a lobbyist who was speaker of the House of Delegates for nine years. “I am not at all sure that our dilemma is currently as bad as some people think it is.”

At the moment, said Taylor, “It’s impossible to say that benefits are too liberal and need to be reduced. If we reach that conclusion, obviously we have to reduce benefits. But we are a long way from reaching that conclusion.”

That being said, State employee unions are expressing concern over the possibility of detrimental changes and reductions in pension and health benefits.

Commission member Barbara Hoffman, a lobbyist who chaired the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee, expects to have “conversations” with union officials, but they won’t be “easy,” she said. “Everyone has to understand that money is not unlimited.”Hoffman noted that some states have cut or reneged on their pension obligations because of insolvency. She said Maryland does not want to be in that position because “it would threaten the state’s Triple A bond rating and open the state to lawsuits.”

Hoffman said she understood the fear of current and past employees and teachers that their benefits could be reduced.

“The biggest fiscal issue is the long-term liability for pensions,” she said.


Appointments Named to Benefit Sustainability Commission

September 10, 2010

Governor Martin O’Malley, Senate President Thomas V. “Mike” Miller, and Speaker of the House Michael Busch recently announced appointments to the Public Employees’ and Retirees’ Benefit Sustainability Commission. The Commission is to study and make recommendations with respect to all aspects of State funded benefits and pensions provided to State and public education employees and retirees in the State.

Appointments include:

The Honorable Casper R. Taylor, Jr – Mr. Taylor, who will serve as chair, served as a Member of the House of Delegates representing Allegany County from 1975 to 2003 and served as Speaker of the House of Delegates from 1994 to 2003.

The Honorable Barbara A. Hoffman – Ms. Hoffman is currently a Partner with The Artemis Group, previously served as a member of the Maryland Senate from 1983 to 2003 where she served as Chairman of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee for 8 years.

Frederick J. Homan – Mr. Homan is the County Administrative Officer for Baltimore County.

Orlan M. Johnson – Mr. Johnson is an attorney with Saul Ewing, LLP and serves as a partner in the firm’s Business and Finance Department and as C-Chair of the Securities Transactions and Regulations Practice Group.

Aris Mardirossian – Mr. Mardirossian is the Founder of Technology Patents, LLC, Engineering and Technology Services, Inc. nad IO Limited Partnership, LLLP.

George A. Roche – Mr. Roche formerly served as Chairman and President of T. Rowe Price.

Karen Johnson Shaheed – Ms. Shaheed serves as Vice President and General Counsel for Bowie State University.

Background information on each appointee can be found in the Governor’s Press Release.  State Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp serves as an ex officio member.

The Public Employees’ and Retirees’ Benefit Sustainability Commission was created as a part of a budget compromise during the final days of the General Assembly session.  The Senate passed a plan that would have started shifting teacher pension costs to the counties beginning in Fy 2012.  The House took a more conservative approach and said it wanted to study the issue in a more comprehensive context.  MACo said it would support taking up a broad study of pension system sustainability.

State Treasurer Nancy Kopp, who addressed MACo’s legislative committee back in July, expressed her hopes for the Commission.

Treasurer Kopp noted that, by its very name, the Commission is focused on sustaining a system of benefits for the public workforce, not on terminating them.  She stated that, regarding funding of teachers’ pensions, she hopes all parties will present to the Commission in an objective manner responding to this question: “How do we assure retirement benefits that will attract and retain a strong teaching workforce, acknowledging the constraints of public budgets?” And she said she hoped that the discussion would be in the context of total compensation – both salary and benefits”.  In terms of benefits, she said, “If you are going to share in contributing to the benefits, you should have a say in what the benefit structure looks like.”  She continued by observing that “…all parties have the responsibility of making the public aware of the actual costs of the system and not exaggerate the problem.”


State Pension System Sells Stock in One Company Doing Business with Iraq and Sudan

July 9, 2010

Legislation signed into law in 2007 and 2008 requires the State Pension System to stop investing in companies  doing business with Sudan and Iraq.  As reported by Barbara Pash of MarylandReporter.com, the pension system has been very slow to do so.

Two years after the General Assembly enacted a bill with much debate and fanfare that would stop investing state pension funds in companies doing business with Iran and Sudan, the pension system has sold off stock in just one company, Royal Dutch Shell.

The pension system, currently valued at $32.4 billion, sold its holdings in Royal Dutch Shell for $38 million in September.

Over a dozen other companies in the system’s funds have been identified as eligible for divestment, but officials cite a variety of reasons for not selling them. Some companies have voluntarily stopped doing business in Iran and Sudan after being asked to do so by a coalition of pension funds that includes the Maryland system.


No COLA for State Retirees in Upcoming Fiscal Year

June 14, 2010

For the first time since 1971, State retirees will not receive a COLA for the upcoming year.  Coverage can be found in the Baltimore Sun and Annapolis Capital.

Retirement payments were actually set to drop slightly in lockstep with the Consumer Price Index, a common measure of inflation that fell in 2009 after rising for more than half a century. Instead, the General Assembly decided to hold the benefits steady and plans to subtract from any increase next year the amount added this year to make up for deflation.


Washington Post Cites Union Deference as Part of Montgomery County’s Budget Woes

June 1, 2010

The Washington Post has been running a series of editorials critical of the influence wielded by teacher and public employee unions over elected officials in Montgomery County.  This culminated in a lengthy May 30 editorial, entitled “A Tale of Two Counties”, in which the Post compared Montgomery and Fairfax Counties and implied that Fairfax County is now in a better position economically because its elected officials were not beholden to unions.

[Montgomery County] has just completed a nightmarish budget year. Stressed, squabbling and besieged elected officials savaged services and programs and jacked up taxes to eliminate an eye-popping deficit of almost $1 billion in a $4.3 billion spending plan. Meanwhile, across the Potomac River in Fairfax County, all was sweetness and light by comparison. With a budget roughly equal to Montgomery’s, Fairfax officials erased a deficit a quarter as large with relative ease and far less drama. …

The region’s two largest jurisdictions — demographic cousins with populations around 1 million, school systems among the nation’s biggest and best, and public spending equal to that of small countries — have parted ways. To put it bluntly, Montgomery is lurching under the weight of irresponsible governance, unsustainable commitments and political spinelessness — particularly in the face of politically powerful public employees unions.

Over the past few months, some readers have asked why we lately have devoted attention to those unions. The diverging paths of Montgomery and Fairfax provide one explanation.

Center Maryland commentary analyzing the Post editorial

Maryland Politics Watch blog article questioning the motive behind the Post’s teacher union concerns


Teacher Labor Bill Passes in the House

April 9, 2010

SB 590/HB 243, the Fairness in Negotiations Act, passed the House on third reader today.  As previously reported, this bill would change the manner of resolving labor disputes with teachers and other school employees. MACo had opposed the bill, raising concerns that replacing the current dispute resolution process through the State Board of Education with a new system including mediation and eventually semi-binding arbitration would lead to both direct and indirect increases in the costs of providing education services in public schools.

The House Ways and Means Committee amended SB 590 and conformed its own bill, HB 243.  The Senate Bill only needs a “concurrence” agreement from the Senate to secure final passage, which appears likely.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers