All Three Rating Agencies Give Prince George’s County a AAA Bond Rating

June 6, 2011

For the first time, Prince George’s County has received a AAA bond rating from the three major Wall Street rating agencies.  Standard and Poor’s gave the county its first AAA rating in 2008, and Moody’s Investor Services followed with a AAA? in 2010.  Fitch Ratings was the last agency to do the same.  According to Gazette.net:

Analysts with Fitch Ratings announced May 27 that they upgraded their rating on the county from AA+ to AAA, the highest rating possible. Ratings are a government equivalent to a personal credit score, and indicate to investors the economic strength of a company, fund or municipality.

For Prince George’s, the top rating means that the county can borrow money through bond sales at a lower interest rate, a move that could save the county millions on the cost of building new schools or other major expenses.

The final Fitch upgrade marks the pinnacle of nine years of steady improvement for the county, which was frequently listed as a riskier investment because of its troubles with crime and low-performing schools and a resident-imposed cap on tax increases known as TRIM.

 


Charles County Commissioners Propose Flat Tax Rate, Slight Increase in Expenditures

May 31, 2011

During a hearing on Charles County’s $307 million operating budget, commissioners proposed keeping property tax rates flat, which due to declining assessments, means that residents could see declines in their property tax bills.  As reported by Southern Maryland Newspapers Online:

Tax bills for individual property owners depend on the assessed value of their properties, but falling assessments in most of the county mean taxes will fall by an average of 3.8 percent, according to county documents, if the tax rate is maintained at $1.026 per $100 of assessed value.In expenditures, the proposed budget includes a 1 percent raise for county employees, who received no raises this year and endured furloughs in fiscal 2010.

Overall the proposed spending is $1.8 million, or 0.6 percent, more than last year, at $307 million, while revenues have fallen 1.7 percent, to reach $300 million.


Prince George’s County Council Approves FY 2012 Budget

May 27, 2011

The Prince George’s County Council approved a $2.7 billion budget that slightly reduces funding to education but maintains funding for key school programs.  As reported by the Washington Post:

With the new budget, council members also allocated funds for an economic development fund and for road repairs, new police and fire recruits, and a one-time $750 bonus for county employees.The public school system receives the single largest share of the county budget: Spending on the schools will total about $1.6 billion, about $13 million less than the current budget.

The new budget also restored cuts that Baker had proposed to nonprofit funding. The spending plan gives the nine council members $100,000 each to hand out to nonprofit groups based in their districts; the executive branch will allocate other funds.


Montgomery County Council Approves Budget, Increases Property Tax

May 27, 2011

The Montgomery County Council unanimously approved a $4.37 billion budget, which increases spending by 2.2 percent.  As reported by the Washington Post:

Funding for schools is down slightly, employees face cuts to health and retirement benefits and spending on recreation, fire and rescue and some social service and other programs is being reduced. The council upped the property tax rate by 4.2 cents, but also included a credit that moderates the increase for homeowners, officials said. Money was also set aside for reserves and to cover future retiree health-care costs, though less than the county says it should be saving.


Howard County Approves FY 2012 Budget

May 26, 2011

The Howard County Council approved a $1.56 billion operating budget and $179.3 million for capital improvements.  The Baltimore Sun reports:

The overall operating budget will increase 8.8 percent, but the locally funded portion of the budget is rising 5.6 percent. County officials said that increase primarily reflects built-in cost increases for things like fuel, health insurance and interest on debt.Ulman used small amounts of new funding to pay for a new stormwater czar to help Howard comply with strict new federal and state standards on runoff. He also fully funded a request for $6.3 million more for county schools and gave Howard Community College a 3 percent boost in local funding to hire more full-time instructors and limit a tuition increase to $3 per credit instead of $4.

In a series of last-minute fund shifts, county police got $400,000 more to hire four new officers for community policing programs, and Recreation and Parks got $125,000 to use in gang-prevention programs for young people.


Most Counties See Actual Decline in Property Tax Base

May 24, 2011

As property assessments are in decline in every part of the state, it comes as no surprise that the effective property tax base is now lower than it was last year for most Maryland counties. The simplest measure of this — which includes the fairly complicated effects of the various phase-in and credits that benefit Maryland taxpayers — is each county’s Constant Yield Tax Rate.

The constant yield tax rate is the tax rate a jurisdiction would need to impose to generate the same amount of property tax revenue in the upcoming fiscal year (FY12) as it did in the current year (FY11).  With property assessments declining across the state, 17 counties have found that their FY 12 constant yield tax rate is actually higher than their FY 11 tax rate — meaning that the tax base for that county has actually shrunk from the prior year’s level.  For a listing of the FY 12 constant yield tax rates click here.

The continuing decline in property values reinforces the widely-held belief that local government revenues will remain in major stress in coming years, even as the State government’s main revenue sources (income and sales taxes, both very much affected by immediate changes in the overall economy) seem to be reflecting overall modest growth trends.


Prince George’s County Rejects Raises, May Provide One-Time Bonus

May 18, 2011

As reported by the Washington Post,  Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker and the County Council may have struck a deal to provide one-time bonuses to approximately 6,000 employees instead of a 2% raise that would benefit 1,500 employees.

In a 5 to 3 vote Tuesday, the council voted down a 2 percent raise for about 1,500 county employees who are members of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

But in private discussions between some council members and Baker, each side held out the possibility that the county would be able to fund bonuses for all county workers this year. Council Chairman Ingrid Turner (D-Bowie) signaled the outlines of the deal in a letter to Baker that discussed similar one-time $750 bonuses for state employees.

Such bonuses for county workers would cost $5 million to $6 million in the fiscal year that begins July 1. The payments would not be rolled into base pay and would not affect pensions or future raises.


Montgomery County to Cut Employee Benefits and School System

May 17, 2011

As reported by the Washington Post, the Montgomery County Council, led by Council President Valerie Ervin, has agreed on a package of cuts to employee benefits and the public school system.  The  Council is scheduled to vote on these key parts of the budget Thursday.

Under the plan, the council would cut $25 million from the $1.4 billion it contributed to the public school system this year. It would also take more control over the way the schools, and other county agencies, save to cover retiree health insurance.

The council would largely direct the school cuts to an account covering employee benefits, said Ervin, a former Board of Education member. The goal, she said, is to keep the cuts from affecting classrooms, while making sure that school employees share in countywide budget cuts.

Ervin said failing to make cuts in school funding would starve other crucial county departments that are facing cuts, including safety-net services, libraries and recreation, among others. There’s also the principle of equity, Ervin said.

For instance, the council is proposing that police, firefighters and other government employees increase their share of health care premiums by 5 percent. (Workers in HMOs would be exempted, to encourage participation in those less-expensive plans.)

The schools could save $7 million by making that same change, according to council figures, and could save $11.7 million more by changing local school pension benefits to reflect recent state pension changes.


Wicomico County Budget Discussions Center on Tax Increases

April 25, 2011

As budget deliberations begin for the FY 2012 operating budget, the central question confronting the Wicomico County Council is whether to support a property tax increase of 6.5 percent to fill an anticipated $4.5 million budget deficit.  County Executive Rick Pollitt, who introduced the tax increase in his proposed budget, notes that without it would require a second straight year of layoffs,  decreased funding levels to Wor-Wic Community College, and call for an additional $2 million to be cut from the public schools system ($7 million to the anticipated $5 million). The Council, who received the budget only a week ago, have mixed reactions to the question at hand.  The increase may generate needed revenue for the County, however the implications it would have on homeowners and businesses is also of concern. DelmarvaNow.com reports:

Pollitt said he doesn’t take the tax increase lightly, but his hand was forced by a historic decline in property assessments and the county’s slow recovery from the recession. His proposal takes the property tax rate from roughly 76 cents per $100 of assessed value to about 81 cents — roughly a 6.5 percent increase, but still within the revenue cap’s restrictions. The new rate would drive up the bill for a $150,000 home by $75 and hits businesses with a triple whammy: bumping up what they pay on their building, equipment and inventory.

“There is never a good time to raise taxes — and this is probably the worst time, with the economy,” said Council Vice President Joe Holloway.

However, Councilwoman Sheree Sample-Hughes said some citizens indicate they are willing to pay more in taxes if it means preserving their quality of life.

“You have to weigh the value against the cost,” Sample-Hughes said.

In anticipation of public commentary on the proposed tax hike, Pollitt has created a “tax calculator” that is available on the county website to assist homeowners in determining what their bill would be with a 5-cent property tax increase.  There is currently not a calculator for how the tax increase would impact businesses.

To help soften the tax blow to homeowners, Pollitt suggests the county lower its Homestead Tax Credit rate from the maximum level of 10 percent to zero percent. That wouldn’t take effect until fiscal year 2013, and the council must pass a law authorizing it, Petersen said.

Councilman Bob Caldwell has lobbied for a zero percent rate for years. He said Salisbury instituted such a rate in the 1990s. He said it essentially prevents homeowners from ever having to pay for the increase in their assessments, although their homes are still assessed and those values will be passed on when ownership of a home changes.

“There is no logical reason for why somebody who has lived in a house from year to year should have to pay more because somebody walked down the street and says, ‘It’s not worth $150,000, it’s worth $175,000 now,’ ” Caldwell said.

Caldwell said it is difficult for him to comment on the budget at this point, but he already knows it will be a “tough” process.


Howard County Releases Proposed FY12 Operating Budget

April 25, 2011

Howard County Executive and MACo President Ken Ulman recently unveiled his proposed $1.56 billion FY12 Operating Budget. As outlined in a Howard County news release, the proposed spending plan includes, no increases to the current property tax rate, funding of the county’s school systems $512.6 million budget request, and driving additional funds towards environmental protection initiatives.

“With the economy beginning to show signs of recovery, we must maintain our commitment to fiscal responsibility and, at the same time, position Howard County to take full advantage of the opportunities this recovery presents,” said Executive Ulman. “Our optimism is evident in this budget, but so is our caution.”

The General Fund Budget is $870.8 million. “Even though state cuts to local jurisdictions are difficult to overcome, the financial decisions we have made allow us to maintain our Triple-A credit rating from all three bond rating agencies,” said County Finance Director Sharon Greisz. Howard County is one of fewer than 30 counties nationwide to have a Triple-A rating from all three agencies.

Continuing the commitment the County has made to restoring the health of our environment, this budget increases funding for the County’s Office of Environmental Sustainability (OES) by nearly 300 percent. As was the case in the Capital Budget, the primary focus of this funding increase is to strengthen the County’s efforts at controlling stormwater runoff, one of the root causes of the degradation of our streams, waterways and the Chesapeake Bay.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers